The Trail Blazers today named Rich Cho as the team’s ninth GM. Cho spent the last nine seasons serving as the Sonics/Thunder Assistant GM & VP/Legal. Financial details were not disclosed (Trail Blazers). Cho joined the Sonics as an intern in '95 while earning his law degree from Pepperdine Univ. As an intern, Cho helped “design and implement one of the NBA’s most advanced and comprehensive” evaluation systems. Prior to joining the Sonics, Cho worked as a Boeing engineer
(OREGONLIVE.com, 7/19).
Monday, July 19, 2010
The Trail Blazers Hire Rich Cho as GM
From Sports Business Daily:
Saturday, July 10, 2010
Emerging Sleeper : Tiago Splitter Joins the Spurs

From Ticket 760
Ticket 760 has learned that the San Antonio Spurs have reached a contract agreement with Tiago Splitter. He is expected to sign the deal on Monday. Terms of the deal have not been disclosed.Splitter was expected to be in the 2006 NBA Draft but teams were backed off by the cost of buying out his huge contract. Splitter was automatically eligible for the 2007 NBA Draft, as he was at least 22 years of age at the time of the draft. He was the 28th draft pick overall, the first round pick of the San Antonio Spurs.
Splitter is an intense defensive player. He is an agressive shot blocker and among the leaders in steals in both the Euroleague and ACB (Asociación de Clubs de Baloncesto or in english: Basketball Clubs' Association). He is not a great rebounder but has an extremely high basketball intelligence. He has been described as an old school type center. He should be an excellent fit with the Spurs.
Offensively, Splitter excels in the low post. Splitter is used to be being the offensive focus of his teams and aggressively fights for his spot in the post. He is not afraid to put the ball on the floor. He has great agility, excellent hands and touch. He has good footwork and an a variety of low post moves, his favorite being a hook shot he can execute with either hand. Although he has shown some improvement, Splitter is a mediocre free-throw shooter, averaging around 70 percent.
Fantasy owners can be excited about the prospect of adding Splitter to their roster but should display the same caution they would with any rookie. He is likely to start at center but should qualify at both center and power forward. Assuming he meets with projections he should be playing full time minutes and emerge as one of the more productive NBA rookies.
2009-10 Defensive Efficiency (Hollinger)
I thought that a good place to start talking Advanced Fantasy Basketball would be with some ranking. The rankings you see will represent the sort of stats we will utilize over the life of this blog. The first is Defensive Effiency.
RK | TEAM | PACE | AST | TO | ORR | DRR | REBR | EFF FG% | TS% | OFF EFF | DEF EFF |
1 | Charlotte | 92.8 | 14.4 | 26.2 | 26.5 | 74.2 | 50.7 | 49 | 53.8 | 101.5 | 100.2 |
2 | Orlando | 94.2 | 14.3 | 23.9 | 24.6 | 77.4 | 51.9 | 53.6 | 57.3 | 109.5 | 100.2 |
3 | Milwaukee | 94 | 14.9 | 21.9 | 26.2 | 76.4 | 50.1 | 48.2 | 51.8 | 102 | 100.9 |
4 | Miami | 91.9 | 14 | 22.7 | 26.1 | 74.9 | 50.7 | 49.6 | 53.7 | 104.5 | 100.9 |
5 | Boston | 93.8 | 16.7 | 25.3 | 22.8 | 73.8 | 49.1 | 52.2 | 56.4 | 105.4 | 101.1 |
6 | LA Lakers | 95.2 | 14.8 | 22.1 | 27.7 | 74.4 | 51.2 | 49.6 | 53.8 | 105.9 | 101.1 |
7 | Cleveland | 93.5 | 16 | 23.6 | 25.1 | 77.2 | 52.4 | 53.2 | 57 | 108.8 | 101.5 |
8 | Oklahoma City | 95.6 | 14 | 24.4 | 28.6 | 73.6 | 51.7 | 49.4 | 54.7 | 105.8 | 101.6 |
9 | San Antonio | 94 | 15.8 | 22.9 | 26.8 | 76.3 | 52 | 51.5 | 55.2 | 107.2 | 102 |
10 | Chicago | 95.5 | 14.5 | 23.4 | 26.6 | 74.8 | 51 | 47.7 | 52 | 100.8 | 102.6 |
11 | Utah | 96 | 17.9 | 24.8 | 26.8 | 75.6 | 51.9 | 52.4 | 56.5 | 107.8 | 102.9 |
12 | Dallas | 94.8 | 16.5 | 21.8 | 24.3 | 73.7 | 49.3 | 50.6 | 55.2 | 107.1 | 103.2 |
13 | Portland | 90.2 | 15.2 | 21.6 | 28.2 | 74.8 | 51.3 | 49.9 | 54.7 | 108 | 104 |
14 | Atlanta | 92.5 | 15.7 | 20.4 | 28.2 | 72.7 | 50.2 | 50.6 | 54.5 | 108.9 | 104 |
15 | Indiana | 99.4 | 14.5 | 24.2 | 21.6 | 73 | 47.1 | 49.1 | 53.6 | 101.3 | 104.2 |
16 | Denver | 97.3 | 14.6 | 22.6 | 26.1 | 72.4 | 49.5 | 50.9 | 56.1 | 108.7 | 104.7 |
17 | Houston | 96.6 | 14.9 | 23.3 | 27 | 73.8 | 49.5 | 49.4 | 53.7 | 104.6 | 105.5 |
18 | Washington | 94.1 | 13.5 | 24.4 | 27.6 | 72.4 | 49.7 | 48.1 | 52.4 | 101.4 | 106.7 |
19 | Phoenix | 97.9 | 15.9 | 23.9 | 27.6 | 70.8 | 50.4 | 54.6 | 58.5 | 112.7 | 106.9 |
20 | LA Clippers | 95 | 15.3 | 25.7 | 27.1 | 74 | 50.4 | 49.1 | 52.9 | 100.9 | 107.1 |
21 | Sacramento | 96.5 | 14.1 | 24 | 27.8 | 73.5 | 50.3 | 49.1 | 52.8 | 102.4 | 107.2 |
22 | New Orleans | 94.8 | 15.7 | 22.6 | 24.8 | 73.8 | 48.9 | 50.6 | 54.3 | 105.1 | 107.3 |
23 | Philadelphia | 93.9 | 14.8 | 24.1 | 27.6 | 73.2 | 50 | 49.6 | 53.4 | 103.4 | 107.6 |
24 | Memphis | 96.1 | 13 | 24.1 | 31.3 | 73.3 | 52.3 | 49.4 | 53.6 | 104.8 | 107.6 |
25 | New Jersey | 93.6 | 13.6 | 24.1 | 25.1 | 71.8 | 47.4 | 45.8 | 50.9 | 98.1 | 108 |
26 | Detroit | 91 | 14.1 | 22.7 | 30.3 | 73.4 | 50.5 | 47.4 | 51.5 | 102.4 | 108.9 |
27 | New York | 96.1 | 15.1 | 23.1 | 23.5 | 72.1 | 47.4 | 50.9 | 54.7 | 105.2 | 109.1 |
28 | Minnesota | 98.5 | 13.5 | 25.5 | 26.7 | 73.6 | 49.7 | 47.8 | 51.8 | 98.9 | 109.3 |
29 | Golden State | 102.7 | 15 | 23.1 | 20.9 | 68.5 | 44.4 | 51.4 | 55.7 | 105.4 | 109.4 |
30 | Toronto | 95.4 | 15.6 | 22.5 | 24.7 | 72.9 | 49.5 | 52.1 | 56.4 | 108.6 | 110.2 |
- PACE: Pace Factor - the number of possessions a team uses per game.
- AST: Assist Ratio - the percentage of a team's possessions that ends in an assist. Assist Ratio = (Assists x 100) divided by [(FGA + (FTA x 0.44) + Assists + Turnovers]
- TO: Turnover Ratio - the percentage of a team's possessions that end in a turnover. Turnover Ratio = (Turnover x 100) divided by [(FGA + (FTA x 0.44) + Assists + Turnovers]
- ORR: Offensive rebound rate
- DRR: Defensive rebound rate
- REBR: Rebound Rate - the percentage of missed shots that a team rebounds. Rebound Rate = (Rebounds x Team Minutes) divided by [Player Minutes x (Team Rebounds + Opponent Rebounds)]
- EFF FG%: Effective Field Goal Percentage
- TS%: True Shooting Percentage - what a team's shooting percentage would be if we accounted for free throws and 3-pointers. True Shooting Percentage = (Total points x 50) divided by [(FGA + (FTA x 0.44)]
- OFF EFF: Offensive Efficiency - the number of points a team scores per 100 possessions.
- DEF EFF: Defensive Efficiency - the number of points a team allows per 100 possessions.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)